BrokerAudit

BrokerAudit may receive compensation from partners featured on this page. This does not influence our ratings. See our methodology.

OANDA vs Pepperstone 2026

A detailed head-to-head comparison of OANDA and Pepperstone across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and more.

OANDA logo - BrokerAudit
OANDA

Est. 1996 · New York, United States

FCACFTC/NFAASIC
79.6/100
Good
Pepperstone logo - BrokerAudit
Pepperstone

Est. 2010 · Melbourne, Australia

FCAASICDFSA
88.6/100
Excellent

Score Breakdown

RegulationCostsPlatformsAccountsDepositSupportEducation
OANDAPepperstone

Category-by-Category Winner

Category
OANDA
Pepperstone
Regulation & Trust
95
90
Trading Costs
62
94
Platforms & Tools
78
95
Account Conditions
82
88
Deposit & Withdrawal
78
88
Customer Support
78
80
Education & Research
80
75
Overall Score
79.6
88.6

Detailed Comparison

Overview

Year Founded
1996
2010
Headquarters
New York, United States
Melbourne, Australia
Publicly Listed
Top Regulators
FCA, CFTC/NFA, ASIC
FCA, ASIC, DFSA
Total Instruments
250
1,200

Trading Costs

EUR/USD Spread
1.40 pips
0.10 pips
GBP/USD Spread
1.90 pips
0.40 pips
USD/JPY Spread
1.40 pips
0.30 pips
Min. Deposit
$0
$0
Commission/Lot
None
$7.00
Inactivity Fee
$10/month after 12 months
None

Platforms & Features

MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
Copy Trading
API Trading
VPS Hosting
Demo Account
Islamic Account

Instruments

Forex Pairs
68
62
CFD Stocks
100
1,000
Indices
15
21
Commodities
8
34
Crypto CFDs
10
30

OANDA vs Pepperstone: Our Analysis

Overall Verdict

With an overall score of 88.6/100 vs 79.6/100, Pepperstone edges out OANDA by 9.0 points. This moderate gap suggests Pepperstone has an edge in several key areas.

Trading Costs

On the EUR/USD pair, OANDA offers an average spread of 1.40 pips commission-free, while Pepperstone comes in at 0.10 pips with a $7.00 commission. Pepperstone offers tighter pricing on EUR/USD. Minimum deposit is $0 at OANDA and $0 at Pepperstone.

Regulation & Safety

OANDA holds 6 regulatory licenses with a highest tier of Tier 1 (FCA, CFTC/NFA, ASIC), while Pepperstone has 6 licenses at Tier 1 (FCA, ASIC, DFSA). Both brokers are equally regulated.

Platform Comparison

OANDA offers MT4, MT5, TradingView, OANDA Trade — uniquely offering OANDA Trade which Pepperstone does not have. Pepperstone supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, with exclusive access to cTrader. Both brokers offer a comparable range of platforms.

Who Should Choose Which?

OANDA suits beginners seeking education, traders who prioritize safety, while Pepperstone is better for cost-conscious traders, traders who want advanced tools, traders wanting a wide instrument range. If copy trading matters, Pepperstone has the edge. Both brokers offer demo accounts, so you can test each before committing real funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our testing, Pepperstone scores higher overall at 88.6/100 compared to OANDA's 79.6/100. However, "better" depends on your priorities — OANDA may be superior in specific categories like regulation.

Pepperstone offers tighter spreads with an average EUR/USD spread of 0.10 pips, compared to 1.40 pips at OANDA. Check our detailed comparison table above for GBP/USD and USD/JPY spreads as well.

OANDA scores higher for regulation and trust at 95/100, holding licenses from FCA, CFTC/NFA, ASIC. Pepperstone scores 90/100 with FCA, ASIC, DFSA.

For beginners, OANDA is the stronger choice with an education and research score of 80/100. It offers structured trading courses, webinars, and a free demo account. Pepperstone scores 75/100 for education.

Yes, there is no restriction on having accounts with both OANDA and Pepperstone simultaneously. Many experienced traders maintain accounts with multiple brokers to take advantage of each broker's strengths — for example, using one for its lower spreads on majors and another for its wider instrument range or better platform features.

NC

Reviewed by

Neil C

Neil C is a financial markets analyst and forex trading specialist with over 10 years of experience evaluating broker platforms, trading conditions, and regulatory frameworks. He has personally tested accounts with dozens of brokers and brings a data-driven methodology to every review.

Last updated: April 2026

Related Resources