BrokerAudit

BrokerAudit may receive compensation from partners featured on this page. This does not influence our ratings. See our methodology.

IC Markets vs XM Group 2026

A detailed head-to-head comparison of IC Markets and XM Group across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and more.

IC Markets logo - BrokerAudit
IC Markets

Est. 2007 · Sydney, Australia

ASICCySECCMA
84.2/100
Excellent
XM Group logo - BrokerAudit
XM Group

Est. 2009 · Limassol, Cyprus

CySECASICDFSA
80.2/100
Excellent

Score Breakdown

RegulationCostsPlatformsAccountsDepositSupportEducation
IC MarketsXM Group

Category-by-Category Winner

Category
IC Markets
XM Group
Regulation & Trust
82
78
Trading Costs
95
72
Platforms & Tools
92
72
Account Conditions
80
90
Deposit & Withdrawal
85
88
Customer Support
82
85
Education & Research
62
92
Overall Score
84.2
80.2

Detailed Comparison

Overview

Year Founded
2007
2009
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia
Limassol, Cyprus
Publicly Listed
Top Regulators
ASIC, CySEC, CMA
CySEC, ASIC, DFSA
Total Instruments
2,250
1,400

Trading Costs

EUR/USD Spread
0.10 pips
0.80 pips
GBP/USD Spread
0.40 pips
1.30 pips
USD/JPY Spread
0.30 pips
1.00 pips
Min. Deposit
$200
$5
Commission/Lot
$6.00
$7.00
Inactivity Fee
None
$15/month after 90 days

Platforms & Features

MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
Copy Trading
API Trading
VPS Hosting
Demo Account
Islamic Account

Instruments

Forex Pairs
61
57
CFD Stocks
2,100
1,300
Indices
25
29
Commodities
24
15
Crypto CFDs
21
31

IC Markets vs XM Group: Our Analysis

Overall Verdict

With an overall score of 84.2/100 vs 80.2/100, IC Markets slightly edges out XM Group by 4.0 points. Both brokers are closely matched, so your choice should come down to specific features that matter most to you.

Trading Costs

On the EUR/USD pair, IC Markets offers an average spread of 0.10 pips with a $6.00 round-turn commission, while XM Group comes in at 0.80 pips with a $7.00 commission. IC Markets offers tighter pricing on EUR/USD. Minimum deposit is $200 at IC Markets and $5 at XM Group.

Regulation & Safety

IC Markets holds 5 regulatory licenses with a highest tier of Tier 1 (ASIC, CySEC, CMA), while XM Group has 5 licenses at Tier 1 (CySEC, ASIC, DFSA). Both brokers are equally regulated.

Platform Comparison

IC Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView — uniquely offering cTrader, TradingView which XM Group does not have. XM Group supports MT4, MT5, XM App, with exclusive access to XM App. IC Markets provides a wider platform selection.

Who Should Choose Which?

IC Markets suits cost-conscious traders, traders who want advanced tools, traders who prioritize safety, traders wanting a wide instrument range, while XM Group is better for beginners seeking education. Both brokers offer demo accounts, so you can test each before committing real funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our testing, IC Markets scores higher overall at 84.2/100 compared to XM Group's 80.2/100. However, "better" depends on your priorities — XM Group may be superior in specific categories like certain niche features.

IC Markets offers tighter spreads with an average EUR/USD spread of 0.10 pips, compared to 0.80 pips at XM Group. Check our detailed comparison table above for GBP/USD and USD/JPY spreads as well.

IC Markets scores higher for regulation and trust at 82/100, holding licenses from ASIC, CySEC, CMA. XM Group scores 78/100 with CySEC, ASIC, DFSA.

For beginners, XM Group is the stronger choice with an education and research score of 92/100. It offers structured trading courses, webinars, and a free demo account. IC Markets scores 62/100 for education.

Yes, there is no restriction on having accounts with both IC Markets and XM Group simultaneously. Many experienced traders maintain accounts with multiple brokers to take advantage of each broker's strengths — for example, using one for its lower spreads on majors and another for its wider instrument range or better platform features.

NC

Reviewed by

Neil C

Neil C is a financial markets analyst and forex trading specialist with over 10 years of experience evaluating broker platforms, trading conditions, and regulatory frameworks. He has personally tested accounts with dozens of brokers and brings a data-driven methodology to every review.

Last updated: April 2026

Related Resources